Boring Ways of Talking About Interesting Anime

So I sat down recently to watch Glass Reflection’s ‘Should You Watch’ for Kiznaiver, one of the more bizarre and experimental shows we have this season, which I’ve had a lot of fun writing my weekly seasonal Impressions for. It’s a show all about characters connecting to each other, which is what stories are all about in the first place, and so every beat of its disarray of character developments reeks of a kind of meta commentary too.

And I think it’s fundamental to notice that, or at least that it’s doing something that’s conscious of itself. Which is why I found GR’s approach to it extremely underwhelming.

GR deserves a lot of praise for how polished and well-paced his videos are. He hooks viewers into his opinion better than 80% of shows airing in any given season. But once we get onto the views themselves, things start to get hairy. You may agree or disagree with his opinion of the show, but the first issue is: what is there to do beyond that? He calls certain characters bland and the plot aimless without any unpacking of his viewpoint, without any traceable reading of the show that could persuade you that his view is correct.

Of course, he’s trying to be ‘spoiler-free’, but any demo you buy for a video game actually gives you some content from the video game; not stuff that will ‘spoil’ the overall experience for you if you choose to go the whole 19 yards and buy the thing, but stuff that makes you feel engaged with it. A recommendations video should likewise be able to let you sample some of the show in support of his thinking, to show how the reviewer has engaged with it. Especially since this is one show where an increased attention to detail renders many of GR’s comments almost completely beside the point.

GR complains that there’s no clear direction for Kiznaiver’s plot, but he takes this from a correct observation into a negative criticism without any explanation or treatment of why the show might be like that. Not knowing where Kiznaiver is going is in fact essential to our connections with the cast. The experiment these guys are stuck with requires them to not know it’s next step, and I hope everyone who has watched it has realized that since what we’re doing most of the show is empathizing with these characters and thus sharing in their ‘pain’ just as they share it with each other, we need to be kept on the side of the test subjects and not know where things are going either.

To call such a purposefully and necessarily obscured plot ‘poor’ as Glass Reflection does is being over-reliant on plots that are clear-cut. I’m sure we can all remember a story in the past that had us absolutely hooked despite the fact that, or because, we had no clue where anyone was going whatsoever. Not every plot is an understandable direction. Has anyone ever read anything by James Joyce?

Most of the other points GR makes similarly riff off a need for things to be simply definable/categorizable. He says the MC has no likeable trait, but what I love about the MC is that he has no likeable trait; that’s his trait. His whole character is about not being open about his character – about not feeling anything. And that emptiness becomes its own kind of substance because of the other characters’ interactions with him. Why is an experienced reviewer like GR doing the amateur thing of evaluating characters as individuals, especially in a show all about taking them out of the separate comfort zones? Moreover, to discount characters because they stand out with having just ‘two’ definable traits and wanting them to have already become so complicated in a meta show that’s all about breaking down these ‘seven deadly character types’ is more or less entirely missing the point of the story. It’s like complaining that a hero in a ‘zero to hero’ show out starts weak.

And you’d ask, but how does that change the fact that I can’t connect to 2D characters? Well, I have a reason to connect to every one of them; because they’re actively trying to connect to each other. And it’s fun, as GR notes. And what we connect to in storytelling is not individuals, but relationships between those individuals. So stop trying to connect to them as separate people if you are. You’ll get as far as they got with each other before the Kizna project began.

Glass Reflection’s first impressions of Kiznaiver don’t give us any more than the surface of his opinions, and it’s hard to think they’d be persuasive, regardless of whether they’re valid, to anyone but people who are already fans of his iconography. And he’s built good, engaging iconography. But the opinions themselves are incredibly contrived ways of approaching such an interesting show. His review of Otonashi’s character in Angel Beats! is filled with the same flaw; characterizing him as if, under the microscope of a review, he’s completely cut off from the rest of the cast and the story. This is not how any show is watched when you sit down with it, and not how one should be reviewed either. Especially not Kiznaiver.

I know why GR is popular, and power to him. But to me he often sounds like a talking comment section, and he could do far more with his fanbase than talk and perhaps even think in the kind of bolt-together, paint-by-numbers phrases that have become colloquialized into MAL-speak and push a review away from any engaging discourse. He moulds a show trying to break out of genre and generic expectations right back into such a fixed design. He automatically wants a character to be ‘relatable’, which is the common expectation Kiznaiver actively disrupts in its early episodes in order to make its cast more than just individually relatable, just like Kill la Kill worked against the expectation of leering at fanservice in its first three episodes. Katsuhira becomes a different kind of relatable; that distant person we all know or knew, who we connect to not because he gives us something, but because he doesn’t. He holds back. And we want to reach out to him because people around him do. And we fulfill the goal of the Kizna project in our own viewing experience.

We can have far more fun with shows like Kiznaiver if we drop these iron expectations of a clear plot and ‘relatable’ characters, and listen to what the show may be telling us about the need for those very things. And then we find a greater clarity and a greater relatability in the product of our intuition.


4 thoughts on “Boring Ways of Talking About Interesting Anime”

  1. I’m not necessarily sure Kiznaiver is going that Kiznaiver will succeed in reforming those character archetypes or not. I know that it seems to make sense to do so in an episodic storytelling, but need we really have early impressions of anime that at the end of their run will be less than the length of a few theatrical releases? Kiznaiver, excluding opening animations and ending credits will be about 4 hours long. You can watch it in an afternoon. It isn’t much of a time investment.


  2. The way I see it, some reviewers – and a lot of people – think that (without realizing it) that being unimpressed = appearing smart. And then they try to justify their “””opinion””” with some writing checkbox taken out of forums and comment sections.
    A character being relatable is nice and all, but is this an absolute divine law? Does everybody has to obey it? Who are we to look down on someone wanting to take a different path? As you said, Katsuhira is not meant to be relatable, but that’s just who he is. I’ll take him any day over some generic protagonist. No clear plot direction? Why should that be a flaw? what do you want, some umpteenth dark baddie that must be stopped?
    PS: the latest episode makes the whole story very clear and coherent.
    For real, well constructed reviews, I recommend Bobduh and his site Wrong Every Time. He reviews Kiznaiver and other series while highlighting both strong and weak points with arguments that make sense and are not merely taken out of some writing 101 basic knowledge (make the character likeable!)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. This is exactly what I find 24/7 in places like r/anime, and what makes so many people stop themselves from enjoying stories like these. I call them ‘iron prejudices’ after one of my favourite critics: you’d probably love to read his thoughts on characters:

      Glad to see other people are picking up on this fallacy of anime communities!


  3. Something to keep in mind is that Glass Reflections, when boiled down, is merely opinion, and I try not to put much stock into it. Hearing Arcada’s thoughts about the current season’s shows are definitely intelligent and worth listening to, but I remember that everyone has their own feelings about what makes an anime good. I personally haven’t seen Kiznavier yet, but I do understand what you said regarding stories that don’t necessarily have to include a clear direction for plot. Besides, most of those type of anime do this on purpose to keep you on the edge of your seat and excited for the next episode! Overall, just remember that Arcada is human just like the rest of us, and he is speaking from a biased point of view based upon the type of storytelling that he enjoys.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s